Odisha Takes Supreme Court Battle Against Andhra Over Kotia Poll Notification
Odisha government files contempt of court petition in Supreme Court against Andhra Pradesh over notification to conduct panchayat elections in disputed Kotia region. The move comes after Andhra Pradesh allegedly violated a Supreme Court order to maintain status quo on the region.

Odisha Moves Supreme Court Against Andhra Govt Over Kotia Poll Notification
The Odisha government has filed a contempt of court petition in the Supreme Court against the Andhra Pradesh government over its notification to conduct panchayat elections in the disputed Kotia region. The move comes after the Andhra Pradesh government allegedly violated a Supreme Court order to maintain status quo on the region. The Kotia region has been a point of contention between the two states for years, with both claiming sovereignty over the area.
The dispute over Kotia dates back to the 1950s when the region was part of the erstwhile princely state of Jeypore. After India's independence, the state was merged with Odisha. However, a section of the population in Kotia, which is predominantly inhabited by the Kondh tribe, has been demanding a separate administration and autonomy. In 2014, the Andhra Pradesh government, which was then in power, passed a resolution claiming sovereignty over Kotia, citing historical and cultural ties with the region.
The dispute took a new turn in 2018 when the Odisha government moved the Supreme Court seeking a stay on the Andhra Pradesh government's decision to conduct panchayat elections in Kotia. The Supreme Court, in its order, directed both states to maintain status quo on the region until further orders. However, the Andhra Pradesh government allegedly went ahead with the notification to conduct elections in Kotia, sparking the Odisha government's contempt petition. The move has raised concerns about the potential for violence and law and order issues in the region, which has seen sporadic protests and clashes between supporters of both states in the past.
Also Read

क़तर की संस्कृति पहल की अगली 8 देशों की घोषणा
इटली, नीदरलैंड, स्विट्जरलैंड, पुर्तगाल और स्पेन को 2030 तक की संस्कृति वर्ष के भागीदार नामित किए गए हैं। यह घोषणा क्वतर के सांस्कृतिक भागीदारों के रूप में की गई है, जो वर्षों की संस्कृति पहल के तहत 2030 तक काम करेंगे।
The Odisha government's decision to move the Supreme Court against the Andhra Pradesh government over the notification to conduct panchayat elections in the disputed Kotia region is a significant development in the long-standing border dispute between the two states. The move is aimed at preventing the Andhra Pradesh government from violating the Supreme Court's order to maintain status quo on the region. The Supreme Court had issued a stay order in 2019, directing both states to maintain the status quo on the disputed territory until the final disposal of the case.
The Kotia region has been a point of contention between Odisha and Andhra Pradesh for several years, with both states claiming sovereignty over the area. The region is home to over 2,000 people, mostly tribals, who have been living in a state of uncertainty due to the ongoing dispute. The panchayat elections in the region were scheduled to be held on September 22, and the Odisha government's move to file a contempt of court petition in the Supreme Court is aimed at preventing the elections from taking place. The Odisha government has argued that the Andhra Pradesh government's decision to hold the elections is a clear violation of the Supreme Court's order.
The implications of this move are far-reaching, and it has the potential to impact the lives of the people living in the disputed region. The Odisha government's decision to take the matter to the Supreme Court is a bold step, and it highlights the state's commitment to upholding the rule of law. The outcome of this case will have significant implications for the border dispute between Odisha and Andhra Pradesh, and it will set a precedent for future disputes of this nature. The Supreme Court's decision will be closely watched by legal experts and observers, and it will be interesting to see how the court rules on the matter.

