Court Orders Daughters to Pay Compensation in Builder's Death Case, Relief for Homebuyers
In a recent court ruling, the daughters of a deceased builder have been held liable for a refund of ₹4.4 lakh to a homebuyer. The court's decision was made after the builder's death, and the homebuyer had approached the court seeking compensation. As a result, the daughters' properties in Vashi

Court Orders Daughters to Pay Compensation in Builder's Death Case, Relief for Homebuyers
In a landmark judgment, the Thane District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum has ruled that the daughters of a deceased builder are liable to pay a compensation of ₹4.4 lakh to a homebuyer, bringing relief to thousands of homebuyers who had been waiting for refunds from the builder's firm. The order was passed after the homebuyer approached the court seeking compensation following the builder's death. The decision marks a significant shift in the way the courts are handling cases involving deceased builders and their liabilities.
The case dates back to 2015 when the homebuyer, who had booked a flat in the builder's project in Vashi, paid an advance of ₹5 lakh but failed to receive the possession of the flat. The builder, who was the sole proprietor of the firm, passed away in 2017, leaving behind his daughters as the sole heirs to his property. The homebuyer then approached the court seeking a refund of the advance amount, which the daughters opposed, citing that their father had made all the necessary payments to the homebuyer. However, the court was not convinced with their argument and ruled in favor of the homebuyer.
The court's decision is seen as a significant victory for homebuyers who have been struggling to get refunds from builders who have either gone bankrupt or passed away. In recent years, there have been several cases where builders have absconded or died, leaving behind their homebuyers in the lurch. The court's order is expected to set a precedent for similar cases, providing relief to thousands of homebuyers who have been waiting for refunds for years.
The court's decision is also significant because it highlights the importance of ensuring that homebuyers' rights are protected even after the builder's death. The order makes it clear that the daughters of the deceased builder are liable to pay the compensation, even though they were not directly involved in the project. This sets a precedent for future cases, where the court may hold the heirs of the deceased builder liable for any liabilities arising out of the project.
The court's order has also been welcomed by consumer rights activists, who have been fighting for the rights of homebuyers for years. "This is a significant victory for homebuyers who have been fighting for their rights for years," said a consumer rights activist. "The court's decision sets a precedent for similar cases and provides relief to thousands of homebuyers who have been waiting for refunds for years."
In conclusion, the Thane District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum's order is a significant development in the world of real estate, providing relief to homebuyers who have been struggling to get refunds from builders who have either gone bankrupt or passed away. The order sets a precedent for similar cases, making it clear that the heirs of the deceased builder are liable to pay any liabilities arising out of the project. While the order is a significant victory for homebuyers, it also highlights the need for stricter regulations to protect the rights of homebuyers in the future.

